A recent article (I use that term loosely) by Eamon Delaney in the Irish Independent newspaper entitled ‘Loud and proud gays want to take over rest of society‘ (Sunday, October 30, 2011) ruffled the feathers of many readers, not just from the LGBT community.
I read the article, and it was probably one of the worst-written articles I’ve come across in a long time. It wasn’t consistent and had no concrete argument, other than ‘the gays’ wanted to have their cake and eat it too.
Delaney revealed the ugly side to the so-called gay community, and the community were not pleased;
Many gays want to have it both ways. Thus gay magazines are full of ads endorsing late-night gyms, sex lines and a freewheeling sexual activity which would be dismissed as sleazy in heterosexual culture. But we also have articles that suggest a yearning for bourgeois respectability.
At first glance, I could only think that Delaney was entirely right. But then I thought for a moment; yes, there are ads for sex lines in various gay magazines, but what about the sex lines in tabloids and so-called ‘lads mags’? Were they somehow cleaner and holier because they featured attractive topless women? No, but because they’re so much more common to the average straight man (and woman) they’re not as much of a shock as when your typical Joe Hetero sees the back pages in a gay mag. Gay saunas are sleazy, but so are the countless dogging/cottaging areas dotted around Ireland, the UK and similar countries. In other words, there is a sordid and sleazy side to Western society, regardless of sexuality.
At the same time, I can’t help but wonder at how many people truly feel that ‘the gays’ are still victimised. I see the same people screaming ‘homophobia’ at the slightest criticism of the gay community – a term which I have issues with myself – and rarely anyone new. It’s as if there are a few characters on the Irish gay scene – who mainly work in media and the arts – who regard themselves righteous champions of the pink people. Go against them, and you’re regarded as a traitor of sorts, branded with suffering from ‘internalised homophobia’. Again, the word is used as a weapon of sorts, losing its defensive power with each use.
I wasn’t the only person to feel ill at ease with the snarling reaction from the somewhat well-known, clique-ish members of the gay community. Nigel Dugdale wrote an excellant piece, reacting to both Delaney and those he offended, while adding his own experience. It made me see that those attempting to defend the apparently-innocent community were not entirely in the right. Then again, it is hard to see the logic to such a poorly-written piece.
Nonetheless, what Delaney has done is opened the floodgates to examining gay life in Ireland. In some ways, it has never been better. In others, it is truly rotten. Either way, it’s very likely that the debate on the health of the gay community in Ireland (and the UK) has only begun.


